Paul Dini ([info]kingofbreakfast) wrote,
@ 2008-01-17 12:21:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: artistic
Current music:"Whistle While You Work" - The Seven Dwarfs

Your animation feature template
While answering a question about Musical Dance Number Endings in animated features, I decided to explore the subject in depth here. Yes, the MDNE has become a cliche of modern animated films, but no more than other tired contemporary animation storytelling devices. Note them, copy them, hold fast to them like a gila monster's jaws to a screaming Cub Scout's leg and you too can have a career in scripting/storyboarding animated features.

Trust me, this process is so simple you could break out the Crayolas and storyboard the whole thing yourself using nothing more complicated than stick figures and tracings of your own hand. Be warned however, most studio execs don't have the attention span to follow the most energetic and entertaining of storyboard pitches for more than three minutes before they start checking their Blackberries for their lunch reservations. If you write your ideas as a treatment or script, the execs can make their readers read it and give them coverage. The good news is these story elements are so tried and true (translation: stale) that even the simplest of readers will get it and enthusiastically pass it along to their boss, who still won't read it but will take credit for all the amusing gags once he sees the completed picture.

Anyway, let's begin. Most cartoon features begin on the plot set-up, usually a revelation of the villain (or villainess) and their plan (usually take over a kingdom, or kill a rival, or get rich or a combination of all three) then establish your hero or heroine, usually a likable loser if male (Aladdin, the guys in Treasure Planet or Atlantis, that dumb panda that's already showing up everyhere), a comically-scattered, sweet, smart, ugly duckling type if female (Belle, Anastasia, the girl in "Enchanted") and the obligatory wacky sidekicks, always one, sometimes as many as three (Flounder, Scuttle, Timon, Pumba, monkey, flying rug, etc., etc.). The villain also usually has a sidekick, either the bungling nincompoop type (Kronk) or the loudmouthed asshole (Iago) or very rarely, some actually sort of threatening creatures (the hyenas in "Lion King.").

The screen action lumps along for 80 minutes or so, consisting of initial skirmishes between hero and villain, the set-up of the traditional hero/heroine love story (these days they usually hate each other at first sight, snark back and forth until the end, then inexplicably fall into each other's arms), songs that explain what the hero, the villain and the heroine each want, a vomit and/or fart joke or two from the sidekicks, and action sequences designed to pad out what could usually be a story told in 10 minutes.

Your primary objective as a modern animation feature storyteller is to get the audience members emotionally charged (i.e., distracted from logic gaps and not thinking too much) so they will be ready for your big finale. This usually consists of the hero defeating the villain (almost always by some initial violent action of the villain that the hero has "cleverly" used to boomerang back on the bad guy; real heroes never being allowed to slay dragons on their own these days) and the villain falling to their death from a great height, the only acceptable way for a baddie to meet their end in a cartoon (Gaston, Frollo, the bear in "The Fox & The Hound," Scar, the poacher in "Rescuers II", anyone notice a trend here?). If the villain can trip over the edge while trying to get in one last cowardly stab at the hero, so much the better. The demise of the bad guy puts everyone in a good mood, so the sidekicks fire up the juke box, or strike up the band, or simply break into song, and while the hero and heroine share a modest kiss, everyone rocks out over the end credits.

Any key dangling story points are lazily and cynically tied up in quick "funny" cut-aways during this sequence. In well-written movies, those points would have been melded skillfully into the plot, but most modern animation execs don't want the audience to have to mentally process new information that close to the picture's end. They want to send their audience out on an emotional high, so kill the bad guy, cue the music, and get in the next load of kids. If the villain has been more funny than evil, a credit sequence cut-away reveals he has survived the fall and is either plotting a return, or is in another comical predicament we can all laugh at before we cut back to the heroes gettin' down with their bad selves to an old Motown song. If a villainous sidekick has been found not all that bad, like Kronk, he is also given a inter-credits tag that shows he was really an okay guy all along and will likely be back as a good guy in the sequel. A few more credit cut-ins handily wrap up whatever the heroes' sidekick's big dream was ("Ah always wanted to fly in a helicopter." Right, explain that one to me), or bring about some family healing between the leads and their respective parents, or provide one last gag with that squirrel-weasel trying to open his nut.

Viola! The perfect contemporary animated movie template. Be sure to thank me when you're collecting your Oscar.

Also note - this template can be used for most current comedies and any Bruce Willis action picture.



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]xbuilder
2008-01-17 09:45 pm UTC (link)
You just decribe a the template for most modern movies also....

Sigh...when did it all go so wrong?

(Reply to this)


[info]timewalker
2008-01-17 09:58 pm UTC (link)
Perfect! Now I just have to make sure the animated feature isn't a WGA gig so I won't be crossing a picket line.....

(Reply to this)


[info]muroku
2008-01-17 09:59 pm UTC (link)
The MDNE would be so much better if an animation company would spoof classic stories by giving it a modern spin...

like PRINCE CHARMING MEETS PRINCE CHARMING

I'd like to see that dance number and picket signs at the premiere.
----------------------
So please let us know when your schedule is less insane. I have an old copy of BATMAN ANIMATED that is so naked without your autograph.

(Reply to this)


[info]sweetdragon
2008-01-17 10:31 pm UTC (link)
Viola? Why not a cello?

(Reply to this)


[info]ladybrick
2008-01-17 10:45 pm UTC (link)
Most depressing thing I've read all day.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-18 01:38 am UTC (Expand)

[info]brermatt
2008-01-17 10:53 pm UTC (link)
Do you think the American mass audiences (and maybe even children specifically) not intelligent enough to appreciate something that doesn't follow the formula?

I can think of examples of films that don't follow the formula, but usually they still have some elements of it.

Finding Nemo, I think, avoided the formula, but had it's own (Bob Hope/Bing Crosby "Road To..." movies spring to mind)...

The majority of Cars was villain-less. (I don't think the King counts.) But it sure had the wacky sidekick and the love interest and all that formulaic stuff...

Ratatoille - maybe the most unconventional was still a talking mouse in a fish out of water story with the villain pratfalls, etc.

I guess the question is can a financially successful film be made that doesn't follow the formulas?

I think Miyazaki makes films that don't follow the typical American formulas, but I think he has his own formulas. And they're not successful for the American audience.

I only ask hypothetically, of course. If anyone can think of the unformulaic (original) way to make a successful film, animated or otherwise, then you shouldn't share it here - you should pitch it. And then hope that the execs actually pay attention instead of trying to figure out if they can make it to the Ivy by 11:30.

Has it all been done? Is there new ground to explore in storytelling that's still accessible to the masses? If there is, are there any studio execs that would finance it?

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-18 01:49 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]doodlesthegreat, 2008-01-18 01:56 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-18 02:01 am UTC (Expand)
I think you're mistaken... - [info]theolive, 2008-01-23 05:24 am UTC (Expand)
Re: I think you're mistaken... - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-23 06:45 am UTC (Expand)
Re: I think you're mistaken... - [info]ravenbell, 2008-01-24 04:46 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]finback, 2008-01-18 09:29 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]patrickdean, 2008-01-23 09:14 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]nekoama
2008-01-17 10:55 pm UTC (link)
I wrote a paper on this for college and it's so true, especially the villain bit. The only recent villain to actually get killed by the hero, rather than fall to their death or die in some other way that's still entirely their fault (Clayton from Tarzan, Scar from TLK are the two I can think of off the bat) was Ursula from Little Mermaid. It's to make the heroes seem like better people, since they didn't kill anybody, but they happened to get lucky and now the villain's gone, nobody's sad, hurrah.

Also, that last line makes me super want to see a Die Hard musical now.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-18 01:52 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nekoama, 2008-01-18 12:12 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lynxara, 2008-01-19 11:57 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]doodlesthegreat, 2008-01-18 01:58 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nekoama, 2008-01-18 12:15 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]electricvinyl
2008-01-17 11:52 pm UTC (link)
"I'd like to thank the Academy, my Mama, my spouse, God, and Paul Dini..." =P

(Reply to this)


[info]tomreedtoon
2008-01-17 11:55 pm UTC (link)
You guys ought to go on strike more often! You NEVER tell us this stuff when you're working! (Maybe, if I want to get interviews with you guys where you spill your secrets, I should have a budget for Jack Daniel's or Chinaco Anejo for liquid bribes.)

(Reply to this)


[info]zatara2000
2008-01-17 11:57 pm UTC (link)
Absolutly brilliant analysis Paul. :D

(Reply to this)


[info]majingojira
2008-01-17 11:57 pm UTC (link)
Great, now I want to write the Anti-standard Animatd movie, rev it up to PG-13 status with violence and cursing, then let it spiral into darkness.

(Reply to this)


[info]megalanzero
2008-01-18 12:02 am UTC (link)
Do you extend this towards CGI films and TV animated series? The funny thing is, the best "this villain is going to die" scenes later prove to, well, not involve any villains actually dying. Best example I can think of is Lex shooting Grodd after the Gorilla City incident in JLU, where it turns out Grodd survives. Oops.

I was reading about the process that led to the resurrection of the Superman series after Superman IV, and it frankly disgusted me how out of sync with people who care about the material studio executives are, and yet they control the system. The formula doesn't matter, the merchandise you can guy out of the formula is what matters. Helloooooooooooo Batnipples!

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]patrickdean, 2008-01-23 09:16 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]megalanzero, 2008-01-26 04:15 am UTC (Expand)

[info]fredhuggins
2008-01-18 02:27 am UTC (link)
If John Lasseter were here, he'd say "It's the journey, not the destination."

And then I'd ask him why he shitcanned Chris Sanders and turned American Dog into "Buzz Lightyear: The Dog"

And then he'd point to something behind me and run away.

(Reply to this)


[info]normanrafferty
2008-01-18 02:50 am UTC (link)
On his album Werewolves and Lollipops, Patton Oswalt describes his job of doing punch-up on animated movies. He goes into a long rant describing how, since the footage has already been shot, he was hired to have characters shout jokes from off screen over the "unfunny" scenes.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-18 03:42 am UTC (Expand)

[info]icanfly
2008-01-18 04:20 am UTC (link)
In a word?

Perfect.

(Reply to this)


[info]finback
2008-01-18 09:26 am UTC (link)
"Your primary objective as a modern animation feature storyteller" - should you choose to accept it..

(Reply to this)


[info]dmann11
2008-01-18 03:50 pm UTC (link)
So i can steal this?

I'll pitch SCREENWRITER:THE ANIMATED MUSICAL

**singing loudly**

Ive got the magic formula, the one that will take me all the way!

And with this magic formula, ill never have to give an exec a ****censored*****

(music slows, camera spins around main character, lights dim to a spotlight)

I just know

i can show

i've got the heart

less talent than a fart,

i can bee,

THEY WIIIIIIIL SEEEEE!

Someday... somewhere, I'll be a haaaaaack!

Edited at 2008-01-18 03:51 pm UTC

(Reply to this)


[info]kaidysoft
2008-01-18 05:49 pm UTC (link)
that was informative, entertaining, and sadly truthful. ;)

(Reply to this)


[info]spencerrino
2008-01-19 03:38 am UTC (link)
Have you ever heard of a screenwriter named Blake Snyder? If not don't worry, neither has anyone else. He was the "mastermind" behind crap like "Stop, or My Mom Will Shoot!" and "Blank Check." Well, he has a book on screenwriting where he basically lays out a very cookie cutter layout for screenplays and people (for some reason) are actually following it. Apparently, executives are actually using his terminology and philosophy when looking at screenplays. If people actually start taking advice from formulaic and mediocre screenwriters then I'm afraid the film industry is only going to get worse as time goes on.

(Reply to this)


[info]sweetdragon
2008-01-19 03:15 pm UTC (link)
Now I miss seeing The Black Cauldron.

Family lore says I went with my parents when I was - when was that, '85? - so five years old. Kids crying and scared all over the place.

I was riveted.

And that's the story of how Dayna got hooked on fantasy. :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]lynxara, 2008-01-19 11:59 pm UTC (Expand)

(Anonymous)
2008-01-22 01:11 am UTC (link)
So, Paul, are you participating in the extras of the Tiny Toons and Freakazoid DVDs?

Please be at this year's New York Comic-Con.

Your pal, John Pannozzi

(Reply to this)


[info]aeka
2008-01-22 02:12 am UTC (link)
Maybe I've been out of the loop, but for once I'd like to see an animated feature where the villain actually has a greater impact on the hero other than "that's the guy that usurped said territory, killed this good guy, and now I must fight him for the greater of humanity". If anything it'd be interesting to see a relationship already established between the hero and the villain where say....they were once close and got along really well until one unfortunate event led them to go their separate ways and it would especially pose a greater challenge for the hero to bring them down.

I don't know if that's been done before (like I said, I'm out of the loop), but something like that would actually be worth watching and still be emotionally engaging for the young audience. Last time I saw an animated feature in the early 2000s, the story followed the format you described in this post.

It makes me sad really that there's very little evolution in the formula from the earlier days of animation to this day. :(

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-23 06:33 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]aeka, 2008-01-23 11:01 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]travisjoel, 2008-01-23 04:40 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]aeka, 2008-01-23 10:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]fani, 2008-01-24 03:10 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]aeka, 2008-01-24 03:18 am UTC (Expand)

[info]waveform_delta
2008-01-23 03:08 am UTC (link)
Gee whiz, Mr. Dini, I'd call you cynic if what you said weren't so very, very true. :sigh:

My secret worry, though, is that I kinda sorta liked some of the films you mention. Am I really so bland as to be a lover of formula?

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2008-01-23 06:00 am UTC (link)
I think that if I were a villain in a Disney movie, I'd probably make extra sure that my evil lair wasn't located up on top of a mountain or overlooking a ravine- it's practically asking for trouble.

Awesome rant and, unfortunately, all too true.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-23 06:37 am UTC (Expand)
Thanks - (Anonymous), 2008-01-23 10:53 am UTC (Expand)
Thanks - (Anonymous), 2008-01-23 11:05 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2008-01-24 12:14 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-24 02:11 am UTC (Expand)

[info]randomizer9
2008-01-23 02:38 pm UTC (link)
"get in the next load of kids."

Therein lies the problem, the mindset of the Powers That Be is still animation = kids. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]kingofbreakfast, 2008-01-24 02:40 am UTC (Expand)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…